+ case "${usergroup_phase}" in + local run_cmd + run_cmd=run_su + shift + run_su /opt/pkg/bin/bmake configure BATCH=1 DEPENDS_TARGET=/nonexistent WRKLOG=/tmp/bulklog/uemacs-4.0nb2/work.log + su pbulk -c '"$@"' make /opt/pkg/bin/bmake configure BATCH=1 DEPENDS_TARGET=/nonexistent WRKLOG=/tmp/bulklog/uemacs-4.0nb2/work.log WARNING: [license.mk] Every package should define a LICENSE. => Checksum BLAKE2s OK for ue400dev.zip => Checksum SHA512 OK for ue400dev.zip ===> Installing dependencies for uemacs-4.0nb2 ========================================================================== The following variables will affect the build process of this package, uemacs-4.0nb2. Their current value is shown below: * CURSES_DEFAULT = ncurses Based on these variables, the following variables have been set: * CURSES_TYPE = ncurses * TERMCAP_TYPE = curses You may want to abort the process now with CTRL-C and change the value of variables in the first group before continuing. Be sure to run `/opt/pkg/bin/bmake clean' after the changes. ========================================================================== => Tool dependency unzip-[0-9]*: found unzip-6.0nb10 => Tool dependency cwrappers>=20150314: found cwrappers-20220403 => Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.12 => Full dependency ncurses>=6.5: found ncurses-6.5nb1 ===> Overriding tools for uemacs-4.0nb2 ===> Extracting for uemacs-4.0nb2 /bin/cp -r /home/pbulk/build/editors/uemacs/work/freebsd /home/pbulk/build/editors/uemacs/work/netbsd ===> Patching for uemacs-4.0nb2 => Applying pkgsrc patches for uemacs-4.0nb2 => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-aa => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-aa Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.4 2012/05/10 20:54:54 dholland Exp $ | |- add missing toplevel makefile | |--- /dev/null Wed Mar 25 14:28:24 1998 |+++ Makefile Wed Mar 25 14:41:41 1998 -------------------------- (Creating file Makefile...) Patching file Makefile using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-ab => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-ab Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ab,v 1.5 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |Configure for pkgsrc. Fix some of the conditionals for a C89+ world. | |--- netbsd/estruct.h.orig 2012-05-10 18:13:41.000000000 +0000 |+++ netbsd/estruct.h -------------------------- (Creating file netbsd/estruct.h...) Patching file netbsd/estruct.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-ac => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-ac Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ac,v 1.3 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- use standard headers |- avoid implicit int |- look in $PREFIX/share/uemacs for data files |- const correctness required by existing const declarations |- suppress false initialization warning seen with gcc 4.1 | |--- src/bind.c.orig 1995-11-19 08:09:20.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/bind.c -------------------------- Patching file src/bind.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. Hunk #2 succeeded at 20. Hunk #3 succeeded at 55. Hunk #4 succeeded at 85. Hunk #5 succeeded at 184. Hunk #6 succeeded at 262. Hunk #7 succeeded at 290. Hunk #8 succeeded at 363. Hunk #9 succeeded at 371. Hunk #10 succeeded at 387. Hunk #11 succeeded at 523. Hunk #12 succeeded at 583. Hunk #13 succeeded at 627. Hunk #14 succeeded at 695. Hunk #15 succeeded at 926. Hunk #16 succeeded at 999. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-ad => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-ad Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ad,v 1.3 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- use standard includes |- don't use sys_errlist |- declare void functions void | |--- src/lock.c.orig 1995-11-19 08:09:22.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/lock.c -------------------------- Patching file src/lock.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. Hunk #2 succeeded at 150. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-ae => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-ae Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ae,v 1.3 2012/05/10 20:54:54 dholland Exp $ | |- Configure paths for pkgsrc. | |--- h/epath.h.orig Sun Nov 19 03:09:52 1995 |+++ h/epath.h Wed Mar 25 13:57:22 1998 -------------------------- Patching file h/epath.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 68. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-af => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-af Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-af,v 1.4 2012/05/23 04:51:38 dholland Exp $ | |- don't erase the default pkgsrc CFLAGS. |- honor LDFLAGS. | |--- netbsd/makefile.orig 2012-05-23 04:59:39.000000000 +0000 |+++ netbsd/makefile -------------------------- Patching file netbsd/makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 38. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-ag => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-ag Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ag,v 1.6 2014/09/23 22:40:27 jperkin Exp $ | |- needs term.h for termcap |- get terminal size from termcap only if LINES and COLUMNS aren't set | in the environment |- return values from non-void functions | (arguably these should be made void but it causes complications) |- don't use implicit int |- add missing conditionals around conditionally-used declaration |- remove unused variables |- use correct type signature for signal handler |- use time_t for calling time() | |--- src/unix.c.orig 1995-11-18 16:36:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/unix.c -------------------------- Patching file src/unix.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 123. Hunk #2 succeeded at 819. Hunk #3 succeeded at 969. Hunk #4 succeeded at 982. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1078. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1100. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1247. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1568. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1720. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-h_ebind_h => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-h_ebind_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-h_ebind_h,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |Use correct initializers. | |--- h/ebind.h~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ h/ebind.h -------------------------- Patching file h/ebind.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. Hunk #2 succeeded at 208. Hunk #3 succeeded at 341. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-h_eproto_h => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-h_eproto_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-h_eproto_h,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- add some missing prototypes |- declare void functions void |- const correctness required by existing const declarations |- use standard headers |- don't try to declare standard functions | |--- h/eproto.h.orig 1996-01-03 02:51:18.000000000 +0000 |+++ h/eproto.h -------------------------- Patching file h/eproto.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. Hunk #2 succeeded at 76. Hunk #3 succeeded at 126. Hunk #4 succeeded at 170. Hunk #5 succeeded at 187. Hunk #6 succeeded at 231. Hunk #7 succeeded at 243. Hunk #8 succeeded at 285. Hunk #9 succeeded at 301. Hunk #10 succeeded at 322. Hunk #11 succeeded at 333. Hunk #12 succeeded at 351. Hunk #13 succeeded at 365. Hunk #14 succeeded at 395. Hunk #15 succeeded at 407. Hunk #16 succeeded at 425. Hunk #17 succeeded at 458. Hunk #18 succeeded at 470. Hunk #19 succeeded at 555. Hunk #20 succeeded at 618. Hunk #21 succeeded at 662. Hunk #22 succeeded at 767. Hunk #23 succeeded at 896. Hunk #24 succeeded at 1073. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-h_evar_h => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-h_evar_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-h_evar_h,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- use correct initializers | |--- h/evar.h~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ h/evar.h -------------------------- Patching file h/evar.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 213. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_abbrev_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_abbrev_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_abbrev_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- return values from non-void functions | |--- src/abbrev.c.orig 1995-05-31 17:49:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/abbrev.c -------------------------- Patching file src/abbrev.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 224. Hunk #2 succeeded at 264. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_basic_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_basic_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_basic_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int | |--- src/basic.c~ 2012-05-10 18:57:11.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/basic.c -------------------------- Patching file src/basic.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 34. Hunk #3 succeeded at 63. Hunk #4 succeeded at 78. Hunk #5 succeeded at 102. Hunk #6 succeeded at 137. Hunk #7 succeeded at 153. Hunk #8 succeeded at 170. Hunk #9 succeeded at 214. Hunk #10 succeeded at 253. Hunk #11 succeeded at 319. Hunk #12 succeeded at 433. Hunk #13 succeeded at 466. Hunk #14 succeeded at 498. Hunk #15 succeeded at 519. Hunk #16 succeeded at 542. Hunk #17 succeeded at 575. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_buffer_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_buffer_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_buffer_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int | |--- src/buffer.c~ 2012-05-10 19:12:43.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/buffer.c -------------------------- Patching file src/buffer.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 41. Hunk #3 succeeded at 66. Hunk #4 succeeded at 151. Hunk #5 succeeded at 170. Hunk #6 succeeded at 215. Hunk #7 succeeded at 271. Hunk #8 succeeded at 306. Hunk #9 succeeded at 327. Hunk #10 succeeded at 488. Hunk #11 succeeded at 598. Hunk #12 succeeded at 624. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_crypt_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_crypt_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_crypt_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int | |--- src/crypt.c~ 2012-05-10 19:12:43.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/crypt.c -------------------------- Patching file src/crypt.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_display_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_display_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_display_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- fix braces warning from gcc |- fix false initialization warning seen with gcc 4.1 | |--- src/display.c~ 2012-05-10 19:12:43.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/display.c -------------------------- Patching file src/display.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 250. Hunk #2 succeeded at 264. Hunk #3 succeeded at 280. Hunk #4 succeeded at 338. Hunk #5 succeeded at 480. Hunk #6 succeeded at 634. Hunk #7 succeeded at 2167. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_dolock_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_dolock_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_dolock_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- declare void functions void | |--- src/dolock.c~ 2012-05-10 19:12:43.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/dolock.c -------------------------- Patching file src/dolock.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 455. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_eval_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_eval_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_eval_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- const correctness required by existing const declarations |- return NULL on some unreachable paths |- fix uninitialized variable bug caught by gcc |- silence gcc 4.1 parenthesis warning | |--- src/eval.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/eval.c -------------------------- Patching file src/eval.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 68. Hunk #2 succeeded at 237. Hunk #3 succeeded at 300. Hunk #4 succeeded at 332. Hunk #5 succeeded at 452. Hunk #6 succeeded at 755. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1248. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1319. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1337. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1474. Hunk #11 succeeded at 1543. Hunk #12 succeeded at 1609. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_exec_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_exec_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_exec_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- const correctness required by existing const declarations |- fix uninitialized variable bug on error path, caught by gcc | |--- src/exec.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/exec.c -------------------------- Patching file src/exec.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 61. Hunk #3 succeeded at 88. Hunk #4 succeeded at 238. Hunk #5 succeeded at 255. Hunk #6 succeeded at 263. Hunk #7 succeeded at 290. Hunk #8 succeeded at 361. Hunk #9 succeeded at 395. Hunk #10 succeeded at 436. Hunk #11 succeeded at 468. Hunk #12 succeeded at 975. Hunk #13 succeeded at 1114. Hunk #14 succeeded at 1165. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_file_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_file_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_file_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- use standard headers |- don't use implicit int |- const correctness required by existing const declarations |- silence initialize warning seen with gcc 4.1 | |--- src/file.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/file.c -------------------------- Patching file src/file.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. Hunk #2 succeeded at 24. Hunk #3 succeeded at 47. Hunk #4 succeeded at 56. Hunk #5 succeeded at 93. Hunk #6 succeeded at 109. Hunk #7 succeeded at 132. Hunk #8 succeeded at 165. Hunk #9 succeeded at 256. Hunk #10 succeeded at 390. Hunk #11 succeeded at 484. Hunk #12 succeeded at 507. Hunk #13 succeeded at 536. Hunk #14 succeeded at 592. Hunk #15 succeeded at 723. Hunk #16 succeeded at 751. Hunk #17 succeeded at 863. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_fileio_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_fileio_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_fileio_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- const correctness required by existing const declarations | |--- src/fileio.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/fileio.c -------------------------- Patching file src/fileio.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. Hunk #2 succeeded at 51. Hunk #3 succeeded at 91. Hunk #4 succeeded at 124. Hunk #5 succeeded at 183. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_input_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_input_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_input_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- silence gcc braces warning |- silence initialization warning seen with gcc 4.1 |- fix signed/unsigned pointer conversions | |--- src/input.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/input.c -------------------------- Patching file src/input.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. Hunk #2 succeeded at 106. Hunk #3 succeeded at 119. Hunk #4 succeeded at 136. Hunk #5 succeeded at 259. Hunk #6 succeeded at 738. Hunk #7 succeeded at 990. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1005. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1143. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1153. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_isearch_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_isearch_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_isearch_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- silence some gcc warnings |- fix uninitialized variable bug caught by gcc | |--- src/isearch.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/isearch.c -------------------------- Patching file src/isearch.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 64. Hunk #2 succeeded at 79. Hunk #3 succeeded at 357. Hunk #4 succeeded at 366. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_keyboard_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_keyboard_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_keyboard_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't mix signed and unsigned char pointers |- silence initialization warning seen with gcc 4.1 | |--- src/keyboard.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/keyboard.c -------------------------- Patching file src/keyboard.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 393. Hunk #2 succeeded at 422. Hunk #3 succeeded at 450. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_line_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_line_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_line_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- declare void functions void |- silence bogus initialization seen with gcc 4.1 | |--- src/line.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/line.c -------------------------- Patching file src/line.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 60. Hunk #2 succeeded at 129. Hunk #3 succeeded at 158. Hunk #4 succeeded at 175. Hunk #5 succeeded at 220. Hunk #6 succeeded at 341. Hunk #7 succeeded at 470. Hunk #8 succeeded at 728. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1066. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_main_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_main_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_main_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- remove unused extern declaration |- silence initialization warning seen with gcc 4.1 |- silence gcc parenthesization warning | |--- src/main.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/main.c -------------------------- Patching file src/main.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 88. Hunk #2 succeeded at 98. Hunk #3 succeeded at 244. Hunk #4 succeeded at 460. Hunk #5 succeeded at 595. Hunk #6 succeeded at 709. Hunk #7 succeeded at 875. Hunk #8 succeeded at 914. Hunk #9 succeeded at 942. Hunk #10 succeeded at 959. Hunk #11 succeeded at 982. Hunk #12 succeeded at 1006. Hunk #13 succeeded at 1030. Hunk #14 succeeded at 1045. Hunk #15 succeeded at 1054. Hunk #16 succeeded at 1071. Hunk #17 succeeded at 1082. Hunk #18 succeeded at 1105. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_mouse_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_mouse_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mouse_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- declare void functions void | |--- src/mouse.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mouse.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mouse.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. Hunk #2 succeeded at 86. Hunk #3 succeeded at 146. Hunk #4 succeeded at 254. Hunk #5 succeeded at 372. Hunk #6 succeeded at 568. Hunk #7 succeeded at 604. Hunk #8 succeeded at 637. Hunk #9 succeeded at 659. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_random_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_random_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_random_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- fix uninitialized variable usage caught by gcc |- silence gcc braces warnings | |--- src/random.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/random.c -------------------------- Patching file src/random.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 37. Hunk #3 succeeded at 127. Hunk #4 succeeded at 185. Hunk #5 succeeded at 235. Hunk #6 succeeded at 290. Hunk #7 succeeded at 337. Hunk #8 succeeded at 353. Hunk #9 succeeded at 398. Hunk #10 succeeded at 428. Hunk #11 succeeded at 437. Hunk #12 succeeded at 476. Hunk #13 succeeded at 524. Hunk #14 succeeded at 552. Hunk #15 succeeded at 587. Hunk #16 succeeded at 649. Hunk #17 succeeded at 745. Hunk #18 succeeded at 780. Hunk #19 succeeded at 813. Hunk #20 succeeded at 833. Hunk #21 succeeded at 862. Hunk #22 succeeded at 891. Hunk #23 succeeded at 931. Hunk #24 succeeded at 979. Hunk #25 succeeded at 1123. Hunk #26 succeeded at 1134. Hunk #27 succeeded at 1152. Hunk #28 succeeded at 1247. Hunk #29 succeeded at 1323. Hunk #30 succeeded at 1349. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_region_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_region_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_region_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- const correctness required by existing const declarations | |--- src/region.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/region.c -------------------------- Patching file src/region.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 51. Hunk #2 succeeded at 87. Hunk #3 succeeded at 129. Hunk #4 succeeded at 194. Hunk #5 succeeded at 255. Hunk #6 succeeded at 345. Hunk #7 succeeded at 438. Hunk #8 succeeded at 530. Hunk #9 succeeded at 548. Hunk #10 succeeded at 587. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_replace_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_replace_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_replace_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- silence initialization warning seen with gcc 4.1 |- fix mixing of signed and unsigned char pointers |- const correctness required by existing const declarations | |--- src/replace.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/replace.c -------------------------- Patching file src/replace.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. Hunk #2 succeeded at 88. Hunk #3 succeeded at 345. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_screen_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_screen_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_screen_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- declare void functions void | |--- src/screen.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/screen.c -------------------------- Patching file src/screen.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 66. Hunk #2 succeeded at 82. Hunk #3 succeeded at 113. Hunk #4 succeeded at 149. Hunk #5 succeeded at 164. Hunk #6 succeeded at 396. Hunk #7 succeeded at 418. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_search_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_search_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_search_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- silence initialization warning seen with gcc 4.1 |- fix mixing of signed and unsigned char pointers |- silence gcc braces and parentheses warnings | |--- src/search.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/search.c -------------------------- Patching file src/search.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 255. Hunk #2 succeeded at 414. Hunk #3 succeeded at 811. Hunk #4 succeeded at 880. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1505. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_tags_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_tags_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_tags_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- remove useless sccs id |- don't use implicit int | |--- src/tags.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/tags.c -------------------------- Patching file src/tags.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. Hunk #2 succeeded at 67. Hunk #3 succeeded at 105. Hunk #4 succeeded at 176. Hunk #5 succeeded at 207. Hunk #6 succeeded at 232. Hunk #7 succeeded at 298. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_undo_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_undo_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_undo_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- return values from non-void functions on unreachable paths | |--- src/undo.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/undo.c -------------------------- Patching file src/undo.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 263. Hunk #2 succeeded at 448. Hunk #3 succeeded at 513. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_window_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_window_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_window_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- return values from non-void functions | (arguably these should be made void, but that causes complications) | |--- src/window.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/window.c -------------------------- Patching file src/window.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 31. Hunk #3 succeeded at 54. Hunk #4 succeeded at 101. Hunk #5 succeeded at 135. Hunk #6 succeeded at 150. Hunk #7 succeeded at 197. Hunk #8 succeeded at 253. Hunk #9 succeeded at 340. Hunk #10 succeeded at 432. Hunk #11 succeeded at 483. Hunk #12 succeeded at 531. Hunk #13 succeeded at 617. Hunk #14 succeeded at 625. Hunk #15 succeeded at 636. Hunk #16 succeeded at 648. Hunk #17 succeeded at 672. Hunk #18 succeeded at 774. Hunk #19 succeeded at 813. Hunk #20 succeeded at 840. done => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_word_c => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/editors/uemacs/patches/patch-src_word_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_word_c,v 1.1 2012/05/10 20:53:30 dholland Exp $ | |- don't use implicit int |- don't index arrays with signed char | |--- src/word.c~ 2012-05-10 19:25:36.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/word.c -------------------------- Patching file src/word.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 74. Hunk #3 succeeded at 100. Hunk #4 succeeded at 127. Hunk #5 succeeded at 155. Hunk #6 succeeded at 192. Hunk #7 succeeded at 230. Hunk #8 succeeded at 280. Hunk #9 succeeded at 372. Hunk #10 succeeded at 442. Hunk #11 succeeded at 454. Hunk #12 succeeded at 600. Hunk #13 succeeded at 635. done ===> Creating toolchain wrappers for uemacs-4.0nb2 ===> Configuring for uemacs-4.0nb2 => Substituting "paths" in src/bind.c h/epath.h => Checking for portability problems in extracted files